Three
years after she was raped, a 12-year-old Delhi girl complains she has been
dealt a rough hand by law. The 15-year-old who raped her was awarded
three-month confinement in a reform home by a juvenile justice board. She says
it's not enough.
The board deals with cases involving under18s.Maximum punishment a juvenile can be awarded — even in a case of murder — is three-year confinement in a special home. “He should have got at least that much,” said the girl, who was nine when she was raped.
The board deals with cases involving under18s.Maximum punishment a juvenile can be awarded — even in a case of murder — is three-year confinement in a special home. “He should have got at least that much,” said the girl, who was nine when she was raped.
She
cannot appeal the sentence — juvenile act prevents it. And, the Delhi high
court has also shot down her plea for a copy of judgment as the law prohibits
it — to protect the privacy and identity of the juvenile offender.
Rejecting
the rape victim's appeal against lesser sentence, justice Mukta Gupta said,
“Concept of proportionality of sentence is unknown to the juvenile justice
act.” The orders passed under the act were only for the rehabilitation and
reformation of the juvenile, she said.
Lawyer
AJ Bhambani said his client’s fundamental right to pursue legal remedies was
denied.
“A
juvenile accused cannot be protected by curbing rights of victims,” Anant
Asthana, an expert in juvenile law, said. Instead of restricting access
to the records, any mention of names or details that could reveal the identity
of the offender or the victim should be avoided, he said.
COURTESY- Hindustan Times
COURTESY- Hindustan Times
No comments:
Post a Comment